Executive Summary |
ES-1 |
7 |
Introduction and Methodology |
1 |
10 |
1. |
Section 1 - Process Selection Rationale |
1-1 |
11 |
1.1 |
Introduction |
1-1 |
11 |
1.2 |
Process Description |
1-2 |
12 |
1.2.1 |
Low-Pressure Syngas Process Description |
1-3 |
13 |
1.2.2 |
High-Pressure Syngas Process Description |
1-5 |
15 |
1.3 |
Discussion |
1-6 |
16 |
1.3.1 |
Technologies Not Chosen |
1-6 |
16 |
2. |
Section 2 - Equipment Design and Cost Estimates |
2-1 |
18 |
2.1 |
Introduction and Methodology |
2-1 |
18 |
2.2 |
Key Design Assumptions |
2-2 |
19 |
2.2.1 |
Sulfur and CO2 Removal |
2-2 |
19 |
2.2.2 |
Tar Reforming |
2-2 |
19 |
2.2.3 |
Cyclones |
2-3 |
20 |
2.2.4 |
Heat Integration |
2-3 |
20 |
2.2.5 |
Methanol Compressor |
2-3 |
20 |
2.3 |
Operating Costs and Utility Requirements |
2-3 |
20 |
2.4 |
Differences with NREL Biomass to Hydrogen Design |
2-6 |
23 |
2.4.1 |
Added Equipment to Chemicals Design |
2-6 |
23 |
2.4.2 |
Increase in Steel Price |
2-7 |
24 |
2.4.3 |
Engineering Assumptions |
2-7 |
24 |
2.5 |
Changing Flows, Conditions, and Compositions |
2-9 |
26 |
2.5.1 |
Flowrate Impacts |
2-9 |
26 |
2.5.2 |
Composition Impacts |
2-12 |
29 |
2.6 |
Follow-Up and Areas for Further Study |
2-12 |
29 |
3. |
Section 3 - Labor Requirements |
3-1 |
31 |
3.1 |
Summary |
3-1 |
31 |
3.2 |
Labor Requirements |
3-1 |
31 |
3.3 |
Differences with Emery Energy 70 MWe Case |
3-4 |
34 |
3.4 |
Differences with NREL Biomass to Hydrogen Case |
3-4 |
34 |
4. |
Appendix A - High-Pressure Syngas Design Case PFDs |
A-1 |
36 |
5. |
Appendix B - Low-Pressure Syngas Design Case PFDs |
B-1 |
46 |
6. |
Appendix C - Equipment Lists and Data Sheets |
C-1 |
57 |
7. |
Gas Cleanup Technologies Evaluated |
D-1 |
103 |
7.1 |
D.1 Introduction |
D-1 |
103 |
7.2 |
D.2 Particulate Removal Technologies |
D-1 |
103 |
7.3 |
D.3 Tar Removal Technologies |
D-5 |
107 |
7.4 |
D.4 Acid Gas Removal Technologies |
D-7 |
109 |
7.5 |
D.5 Ammonia, Alkali, and Other Contaminants |
D-13 |
115 |