1 |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
1 |
2 |
INTRODUCTION |
3 |
|
2.1 |
Project Objectives |
3 |
2.2 |
Macro- and Meso-Porous SiC Membranes as Substrates for SiC-H2
Selective Membranes |
4 |
2.3 |
Porous SiC Membranes via Prepyrolysis of Pre-Ceramic Polymers |
4 |
2.4 |
H2 Selective SiC Membranes via Chemical Vapor
Deposition/Infiltration (CVD/I) |
5 |
2.5 |
Microporous SiC Membranes via Sol-Gel Approach |
5 |
2.6 |
Product Development and Process Simulation for WGS |
6 |
3 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE |
6 |
|
3.1 |
Macroporous SiC Membranes as Substrates for SiC-H2
Selective Membranes |
6 |
3.2 |
H2 Selective SiC Membranes via Chemical Vapor
Deposition/Infiltration (CVD/I) |
6 |
3.3 |
H2 Selective SiC Membranes via Pyrolysis of
Pre-ceramic Polymers |
7 |
3.4 |
Microporous Membranes via Sol Gel Approach |
7 |
3.5 |
Thermal and Hydrothermal Stability Test |
8 |
4 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
9 |
|
4.1 |
SiC Macro- and Meso-porous Membranes as Substrates |
9 |
4.2 |
H2 Selective SiC Membranes via Chemical Vapor
Deposition/Infiltration (CVD/I) |
9 |
4.3 |
H2 Selective SiC Membranes via Pyrolysis of Pre
-ceramic Polymers |
11 |
4.4 |
Microporous Membrane via Sol-Gel Approach |
12 |
4.5 |
Product Development and Process Simulation for WGS |
15 |
5 |
CONCLUSION |
16 |
BIBLIOGRAPHY |
61 |
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS |
63 |
Publications as a result of current research under
this project |
64 |
|
LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES |
|
Table 1 |
Helium and Nitrogen Permeances of Mesoporous SiC Membranes
Prepared via Calcination of Polycarbosilane |
19 |
Table 2 |
Permeance of SiC membranes after CVD/I at 750ºC and after
calcination at 1,000ºC |
20 |
Table 3 |
Permeance vs. temperature for SiC H2-selective
membranes prepared with CVD/I technique at 700ºC |
21 |
|
|
|
Figure 1 |
The cumulative particle and pore sizes distribution of substrate
made from 1º (P1) average particle size powder |
22 |
Figure 2 |
The permeability and separation factor of macroporous substrate
(P1) |
22 |
Figure 3 |
SEM photomicrograph of top surface of SiC macroporous substrate
(P1) |
23 |
Figure 4 |
Pore size distribution (based on BET measurement) of SiC film
prepared from calcination fo polycarbosilane |
23 |
Figure 5 |
XRD pattern of SiC substrate prepared from calcination of
polycarbosilane |
24 |
Figure 6 |
SEM photomicrograph (of top surface) of SiC microporous
substrate prepared from calcination of polycarbosilane |
24 |
Figure 7 |
XRD pattern ($-SiC) of unsupported SiC thin film prepared with
sol-gel technique |
25 |
Figure 8 |
Pore size distribution (based upon N2 adsorption) of
SiC thin film prepared via sol-gel technique |
25 |
Figure 9 |
Surface topograph of microporous SiC membrane prepared via
sol-gel technique |
26 |
Figure 10 |
Gas permeance (single component) and separation factor vs.
transmembrane pressure drop of microporous SiC membrane supported on
SiC macroporous substrate |
27 |
Figure 11 |
XRD pattern of SiC powder prepared from pre-ceramic polymer (AHPCS)
calcined at 1,000ºC to 1,600ºC |
28 |
Figure 12 |
Calculated crystal size of the SiC powder prepared from
pre-ceramic polymer (AHPCS) calcined at 1,000 to 1,600ºC |
29 |
Figure 13 |
Effect of the number of coating on the permeance and separation
factor (at room temperature) of SiC H2 selective
membranes prepared from pre-ceramic polymer (AHPCS) coated on SiC
macroporous substrate |
30 |
Figure 14 |
Pore size distribution (microporous range) of SiC powder
prepared via pyrolysis (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) of pre-ceramic powder |
31-32 |
Figure 15 |
Pore size distribution (meso- and micro-porous range) of SiC
powder prepared from pyrolysis of pre-ceramic polymer (AHPCS) |
33 |
Figure 16 |
permeance of N2 and He as a function of temperature
obtained from SiC membrane prepared with pre-ceramic polymer (AHPCS)
coated on SiC macroporous substrate |
34 |
Figure 17 |
Separation factor (He/N2) as a function of
temperature obtained from SiC H2 selective membrane
prepared with a pre-ceramic polymer (AHPCS) coated on SiC porous
substrate |
35 |
Figure 18 |
XRD analysis of unsupported SiC films prepared via CVD/I at
750ºC and calcined at 1,000 (bottom), 1,200 (middle), and 1,400ºC
(top) |
36 |
Figure 19a |
SEM photomicrograph of M&P's alumina microporous substrate (ca.
100D ) with SiC thin film deposition via CVD/I |
37 |
Figure 19b |
Higher magnification of Figure 19a |
37 |
Figure 20 |
SEM photomicrograph of the SiC membrane after oxidation at 400ºC
in air for two hours |
38 |
Figure 21 |
Permeance and selectivity vs. temperature for one of the SiC
membranes (TPS-006B) |
39 |
Figure 22 |
Permeance of SiC membrane at 450ºC and 30% steam (membrane after
post-treated to remove excess carbon) |
40 |
Figure 23a |
XRD pattern of SiC powder (prepared from Sol6) before the
hydrothermal stability test at 350ºC and 50% steam (ambient pressure
base) |
41 |
Figure 23b |
XRD pattern of SiC powder (prepared from Sol6) after the
hydrothermal stability test at 350ºC and 50% steam (ambient
pressure) |
41 |
Figure 24 |
Pore size distribution of SiC powder (prepared from Sol6) before
and after hydrothermal stability test at 350ºC and 50% steam
(ambient pressure) |
41 |
Figure 25a |
Hydrothermal stability test of silicon carbon membrane (TPS-021)
at 750ºC and 50% steam (atmospheric pressure) |
42 |
Figure 25b |
Helium and nitrogen permeance of SiO2 membrane
stability test at 600ºC and 20% steam (for comparison) |
42 |
Figure 26 |
Effect of thermal cycling on SiC membrane (TPS-006B) supported
in Al2O3 membrane: assessment of thermal
mismatch between SiC and Al2O3 |
43 |
Figure 27 |
The TEM picture of the organo-silica sol type IPAST with
particle size 8-11 nm, provided by Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. |
44 |
Figure 28 |
The XRD pattern of a SiC powder treated with HF, air, and steam |
45 |
Figure 29 |
The pore size distribution of the SiC powders after various
treatment |
46 |
Figure 30 |
The dV/dlogD of the SiC substrate utilized in the preparation of
the sol-gel membrane |
47 |
Figure 31 |
The argon permeance of the membrane as a function of the
pressure gradient and the number of coatings |
48 |
Figure 32 |
The separation factor of the membrane as a function of the
pressure gradient and the number of coatings |
49 |
Figure 33 |
The XRD patterns of the SiC membrane and the unsupported film
(powder) prepared by the same techniques |
50 |
Figure 34 |
Argon permeance of the SiC membrane in the presence of steam |
51 |
Figure 35 |
A SEM picture of the cross section of the SiC membrane prepared
by sol-gel technique |
52 |
Figure 36 |
The XPS spectrum of the SiC powder sample |
53 |
Figure 37 |
Performance of M&P Hydrogen Selective Membrane (U-130) and its
Storage Stability (presented in terms of H2 Permeance) |
54 |
Figure 38 |
Performance of M&P Hydrogen Selective Membrane and its Long Term
Storage Stability (U-130): in terms of Nitrogen Permeance |
55 |
Figure 39 |
Hydrothermal Stability Test of M&P Hydrogen Selective Membrane (200±5C
with 3±-0.5bar steam) |
56 |
Figure 40 |
Hydrogen purity plotted as a function of hydrogen recovery for a
full-scale M&P hydrogen selective membrane at 150°C
and 100 psig |
57 |
Figure 41 |
CO Conversion in Packed bed vs. Membrane Reactor |
58 |
Figure 42 |
CO Conversion through WGS: Effect of Steam/CO Ratio |
59 |
Figure 43 |
Effect of Steam/CO ratio for Hydrogen Recovery in Membrane
reactor (same condition as above) |
60 |
Figure 44 |
CO Concentration in H2 Recovered from Membrane
Reactor (same condition as above) |
60 |