| Disclaimer | 
			
			 ii  | 
		
		
			| Abstract | 
			
			 iii  | 
		
		
			| Table of Contents | 
			
			 v  | 
		
		
			| List of Figures | 
			vii | 
		
		
			| List of Tables | 
			ix | 
		
		
			| Executive Summary | 
			x | 
		
		
			| 
			 1  | 
			INTRODUCTION | 
			1 | 
		
		
			|   | 
			
			 1.1  | 
			High Temperature Gas Desulfurization | 
			1 | 
		
		
			| 
			 1.2  | 
			Ceria-Zirconia Catalyst Research | 
			3 | 
		
		
			| 
			 1.3  | 
			Objectives of the Research | 
			3 | 
		
		
			| 
			 2  | 
			ELECTROCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF 
			CeO2-ZrO2 | 
			4 | 
		
		
			|   | 
			
			 2.1  | 
			Electrochemical Experimental | 
			4 | 
		
		
			| 
			 2.2  | 
			Solid State Analyses | 
			5 | 
		
		
			| 
			 2.3  | 
			Electrosynthesis Results and Discussion | 
			6 | 
		
		
			| 
			    | 
			
			 2.3.1  | 
			Composition | 
			6 | 
		
		
			| 
			 2.3.2  | 
			XRD and TEM Characterization | 
			6 | 
		
		
			| 
			 2.3.3  | 
			Electrochemical Process Characterization | 
			12 | 
		
		
			| 
			 3  | 
			REACTION AND SORBENT CHARACTERIZATION EQUIPMENT | 
			16 | 
		
		
			|   | 
			
			 3.1  | 
			Fixed-Bed Reactor | 
			16 | 
		
		
			| 
			 3.2  | 
			Gas Analysis | 
			18 | 
		
		
			| 
			 3.3  | 
			Electrobalance Reactor | 
			21 | 
		
		
			| 
			 3.4  | 
			BET Surface Area | 
			24 | 
		
		
			| 
			 3.5  | 
			X-Ray Diffraction | 
			24 | 
		
		
			| 
			 4  | 
			SORBENT MATERIALS | 
			24 | 
		
		
			|   | 
			
			 4.1  | 
			Commercial Sorbents | 
			25 | 
		
		
			| 
			 4.2  | 
			Sorbents Synthesized at LSU | 
			25 | 
		
		
			| 
			 4.3  | 
			Sorbent Nomenclature | 
			26 | 
		
		
			| 
			 5  | 
			SORBENT CHARACTERIZATION RESULTS | 
			26 | 
		
		
			|   | 
			
			 5.1  | 
			X-Ray Diffraction Spectra | 
			26 | 
		
		
			| 
			 5.2  | 
			BET Surface Area and Crystallite Size | 
			28 | 
		
		
			| 
			 5.3  | 
			Sorbent Reduction | 
			29 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6  | 
			FIXED-BED DESULFURIZATION RESULTS | 
			33 | 
		
		
			|   | 
			
			 6.1  | 
			Reaction Conditions and Dimensionless Time | 
			33 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.2  | 
			Typical Reactor Response Curves | 
			36 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.3  | 
			Commercial Ceria Sorbents | 
			38 | 
		
		
			|   | 
			
			 6.3.1  | 
			Ce(RP) vs Ce(Alfa) | 
			38 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.3.2  | 
			The Effect of Temperature on Ce(RP) | 
			40 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.3.3  | 
			Pre-reduction of Ce(RP) | 
			40 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.3.4  | 
			The Effect of CO2 on Sulfidation of Ce(RP) | 
			42 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.4  | 
			Commercial Ceria-Zirconia Sorbents | 
			43 | 
		
		
			| 
			    | 
			
			 6.4.1  | 
			Comparison of CZ(Nex) and Ce(RP) | 
			43 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.4.2  | 
			Pre-reduction of CZ(Nex) 85 | 
			44 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.3.5  | 
			The Effect of CO2 on sulfidation of 
			CZ(Nex) 70 | 
			45 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.5  | 
			LSU Ceria and Ceria-Zirconia Sorbents | 
			45 | 
		
		
			|   | 
			
			 6.5.1  | 
			Defining Reference Time for Ceria-Zirconia Sorbents | 
			46 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.5.2  | 
			The Effect of Sulfidation Temperature | 
			47 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.5.3  | 
			The Effect of Pre-reduction | 
			49 | 
		
		
			| 
			 6.5.4  | 
			The Effect of CO2 Addition | 
			51 | 
		
		
			| 
			 7  | 
			SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS | 
			55 | 
		
		
			| 
			 8  | 
			REFERENCES | 
			56 | 
		
		
			|   | 
		
		
			| LIST OF FIGURES | 
		
		
			| 
			 Figure 1  | 
			Electrochemical Cell Schematic | 
			5 | 
		
		
			| Figure 2 | 
			Electrolyte Concentration vs. Final Powder 
			Composition | 
			7 | 
		
		
			| Figure 3 | 
			TEM Images of (a) Ceria, (b) Ceria-7 mol% Zirconia 
			(c) Ceria-18 mol% Zirconia | 
			8 | 
		
		
			| Figure 4 | 
			Selected-Area Electron Diffraction (SAED) Pattern 
			Taken Over a Large Area Shown in Figure 3 | 
			9 | 
		
		
			| Figure 5 | 
			XRD Analysis of (a) Electrochemically Generated 
			Nanocrystalline Ceo(0.82)Zr(0.18)O2. (b) Cubic CeO2 
			(JCPDS 34-394), and (c) Monoclinic (JCPDS 37-1484) and Tetragonal (JCPDS 
			42-1164) ZrO2 | 
			10 | 
		
		
			| Figure 6 | 
			XRD Patterns for Three Different Cel-xZrxO2 
			Samples, where x Represents the Mol Fraction of Zirconia | 
			11 | 
		
		
			| Figure 7 | 
			A Comparison Between the LSU and Commercial NexTech 
			XRD Powder Patterns | 
			11 | 
		
		
			| Figure 8 | 
			Heat Treated 700oC, 
			18.7 mol % Zr Ceria-Zirconia with Resulting Crystallite Size of (a) 
			9.5 nm, (b) 10 nm, (c) 11 nm, (d) 12 nm, (e) 12.5 nm, (f) 12.5 nm, 
			and (g) 14.5 nm | 
			12 | 
		
		
			| Figure 9 | 
			TEM Micrograph of 18.7% mol ZrO2 After 
			106 hrs of Heat Treatment at 700oC | 
			13 | 
		
		
			| Figure 10 | 
			Heat Treated 700oC, 
			65.2% mol Zr, Ceria-Zirconia with Resulting Crystallite Size of (a) 
			4 nm, (b) 5 nm, (c) 6 nm, (d,e) 7 nm, and (g) 8nm. Heat Treated 
			Times Shown at Right | 
			13 | 
		
		
			| Figure 11 | 
			TEM Micrograph of 65.2% at Zr After 106 hr of Heat 
			Treatment at 700oC | 
			14 | 
		
		
			| Figure 12 | 
			Current Characteristics for the Ce and Ce-Zr 
			Electrolyte at an Applied Potential of - 2.0 V and Stagnant Solution | 
			15 | 
		
		
			| Figure 13 | 
			Current Characteristics of Ceria-Zirconia in 
			Quiescent Solution and With a Stirring speed of 900 rpm at an 
			Applied Potential of -2.0 V | 
			15 | 
		
		
			| Figure 14 | 
			Polarization Curves Corrected for Ohmic Drop, 
			Solution C for a Scan Rate of 5mV/s | 
			16 | 
		
		
			| Figure 15 | 
			Fixed-Bed Reactor System | 
			17 | 
		
		
			| Figure 16 | 
			Details of the Quartz Reactor | 
			18 | 
		
		
			| Figure 17 | 
			Chromatograph Sampling Arrangement | 
			20 | 
		
		
			| Figure 18 | 
			PFPD Calibration Curve | 
			22 | 
		
		
			| Figure 19 | 
			PFPD Chromatogram at 0.1 ppmv H2S | 
			22 | 
		
		
			| Figure 20 | 
			TCD Calibration Curve | 
			23 | 
		
		
			| Figure 21 | 
			Electrobalance Reactor System | 
			23 | 
		
		
			| Figure 22 | 
			XRD Spectra of (a) LSU CeO2 (b) cubic CeO2 
			(JCPDS 34-394) | 
			27 | 
		
		
			| Figure 23 | 
			XRD Spectra of (a) CZ(Nex) 85, (b) Tetragonal ZrO2 
			(JCPDS 88-1007) | 
			27 | 
		
		
			| Figure 24 | 
			XRD Spectra of (a) Ce(LSU), (b) CZ(LSU)90, and (c) 
			CZ(LSU)80 | 
			28 | 
		
		
			| Figure 25 | 
			Weight Loss Associated with Heating in an Inert 
			Atmosphere | 
			30 | 
		
		
			| Figure 26 | 
			Reduction of Ce(RP) in Three Reducing Gas 
			Compositions | 
			31 | 
		
		
			| Figure 27 | 
			Comparison of Reducibility of Ce(RP) and CZ(Nex) 80 
			in Gas 2 | 
			32 | 
		
		
			| Figure 28 | 
			Reducibility of Ce(LSU), CZ(LSU) 90 and CZ(LSU) 80 
			in Gas 3 | 
			32 | 
		
		
			| Figure 29 | 
			Typical Sulfidation Breakthrough Curves and Sorbent 
			Conversions (Full Concentration Scale) | 
			37 | 
		
		
			| Figure 30 | 
			Typical Sulfidation Prebreakthrough Curves (Expanded 
			Concentration Scale) | 
			37 | 
		
		
			| Figure 31 | 
			Sulfidation Breakthrough Curves of Pure CeO2 
			Sorbents (Full Concentration Scale) | 
			39 | 
		
		
			| Figure 32 | 
			Sulfidation Breakthrough Curves of Pure CeO2 
			Sorbents (Expanded Concentration Scale) | 
			39 | 
		
		
			| Figure 33 | 
			Temperature Effect on Sulfidation of Ce(RP) | 
			41 | 
		
		
			| Figure 34 | 
			The Effect of Pre-reduction on Sulfidation of Ce(RP) | 
			41 | 
		
		
			| Figure 35 | 
			The Effect of CO2 on Sulfidation of Ce(RP) | 
			42 | 
		
		
			| Figure 36 | 
			Comparison of the Sulfidation of Ce(RP) and CZ(Nex) | 
			44 | 
		
		
			| Figure 37 | 
			The Effect of Pre-reduction on Sulfidation of CZ(Nex) 
			85 | 
			45 | 
		
		
			| Figure 38 | 
			The Effect of CO2 on Sulfidation of 
			CZ(Nex) 70 | 
			46 | 
		
		
			| Figure 39 | 
			Complete Sulfidation Breakthrough Curves Using LSU 
			Sorbents | 
			48 | 
		
		
			| Figure 40 | 
			The Effect of Temperature on Sulfidation of Ce(LSU) | 
			48 | 
		
		
			| Figure 41 | 
			The Effect of Temperature on Sulfidation of 
			CZ(LSU)80 | 
			49 | 
		
		
			| Figure 42 | 
			Comparison of the Sulfidation Performance of Ce(LSU), 
			CZ(LSU)90, and CZ(LSU)80 | 
			50 | 
		
		
			| Figure 43 | 
			The Effect of Prereduction on Sulfidation of 
			CZ(LSU)90 | 
			50 | 
		
		
			| Figure 44 | 
			The Effect of CO2 Addition Using Ce(LSU) 
			(Full Concentration Scale) | 
			52 | 
		
		
			| Figure 45 | 
			The Effect of CO2 Addition Using Ce(LSU) 
			(Expanded Concentration Scale) | 
			52 | 
		
		
			| Figure 46 | 
			The Effect of CO2 Addition Using 
			CZ(LSU)80 (Full Concentration Scale) | 
			53 | 
		
		
			| Figure 47 | 
			The Effect of CO2 Addition Using 
			CZ(LSU)80 (Expanded Concentration Scale) | 
			53 | 
		
		
			|   | 
		
		
			| LIST OF TABLES | 
		
		
			| Table 1 | 
			Composition of the Various Electrolyte Solutions (M) | 
			5 | 
		
		
			| Table 2 | 
			Resistivity of Solution C at Various Times of 
			Deposition | 
			14 | 
		
		
			| Table 3 | 
			Gas Chromatograph Operating Conditions | 
			19 | 
		
		
			| Table 4 | 
			Average Crystallite Sizes and BET Surface Areas of 
			Test Sorbents | 
			29 | 
		
		
			| Table 5 | 
			Summary of Reduction Results for Eight Test Sorbents | 
			34 | 
		
		
			| Table 6 | 
			Calculation of the Reference Times for Sulfidation 
			Reactions | 
			36 | 
		
		
			| Table 7 | 
			Reference Times for Two Sulfidation Stoichiometries | 
			47 | 
		
		
			| Table 8 | 
			Summary of Sulfidation Test Results at 700oC 
			Using LSU Sorbents and Varying CO2 Feed Gas 
			Concentrations | 
			54 |