Section 1
1085kb |
1 |
Introduction |
1 |
2 |
Background |
2 |
3 |
Approach and Rationale |
5 |
|
3.1 |
Target Blends |
3.2 |
Choice of Cases |
3.3 |
Energy Park |
4 |
Methodology |
9 |
|
4.1 |
Design |
|
4.1.1 |
Case Studies |
4.1.2 |
Scale of Operation |
4.1.3 |
Available Technology |
4.2 |
Economics |
|
4.2.1 |
Assumptions |
4.2.2 |
Measures of Economic Feasibility |
4.3 |
Screening of Alternatives |
5 |
Description of Cases |
14 |
|
5.1 |
Process Concept |
5.2 |
Designs |
Section 2
814kb |
6 |
Results and Discussion |
17 |
|
6.1 |
Cost Economics of Designs |
6.2 |
Energy Efficiency of Designs |
6.3 |
Fugitive Emissions |
7 |
Conclusions |
27 |
8 |
Recommendations and Future Work |
29 |
|
8.1 |
Optimization |
8.2 |
Sensitivity Analysis |
|
8.2.1 |
Process |
8.2.2 |
Cost and Price |
8.3 |
Energy Park |
8.4 |
Possible Additional Case Studies |
9 |
References |
31 |
|
10 |
Appendices |
33 |
|
Appendix A Case 1:
Texaco gasifier and steam reforming of natural gas (including fugitive emissions study)
3277kb |
Appendix B Case 2:
Lurgi gasifier 692kb |
Appendix C Case 3:
Natural gas only 441kb |
Appendix D Case 4:
Texaco gasifier and sour gas shift converter 732kb |
Appendix E Case 5:
Shell gasifier and sour gas shift converter 715kb |
Appendix F Case 6:
Shell gasifier and steam reforming of natural gas 751kb |
Appendix G Case 7:
Texaco gasifier and power production facility 714kb |
Appendix H Scale-up and
comparison of design cases 230kb |