Abstract |
ii |
Acronyms and Definitions |
iv |
Executive Summary |
1 |
A |
Introduction |
3 |
B |
Results and Discussion |
5 |
|
1 |
Evaluation of Various Classes of Syngas Contaminants
as Methanol Catalyst Poisons |
5 |
|
1.1 |
General Procedures for Syngas Contaminant Evaluation |
5 |
1.2 |
Arsenic-Containing Contaminants |
6 |
1.3 |
Phosphorus-Containing Contaminants |
9 |
1.4 |
Sulfur-Containing Contaminants |
10 |
1.5 |
Nitrogen-Containing Contaminants |
13 |
1.6 |
Halide-Containing Contaminants |
15 |
1.7 |
Volatile Metal Carbonyls |
17 |
1.8 |
Evaluation of "Self-Poisoning" |
20 |
1.9 |
Poison Comparison |
20 |
2 |
Adsorbents for the Removal of Catalyst Poisons from
Syngas |
23 |
|
2.1 |
Adsorbent Screening |
23 |
2.2 |
Evaluation of Copper-Impregnated Carbon (CuO/C)
Adsorbent |
27 |
2.3 |
Evaluation of Cu/C for Other Syngas Contaminants |
34 |
2.4 |
Alternate Adsorbents |
36 |
3 |
Analytical Results from Kingsport Samples |
39 |
|
3.1 |
Kingsport Catalyst Campaign 1 |
40 |
3.2 |
Kingsport Catalyst Campaign 2 |
40 |
|
3.2.a |
Catalyst Analysis |
41 |
3.2.b |
Mineral Oil Analysis |
49 |
3.3 |
Kingsport Catalyst Campaign 3 |
51 |
3.4 |
Kingsport Catalyst Campaign 4 |
55 |
4 |
LPMEOH~ Demonstration Unit Contaminant Removal
Configurations and Trials |
55 |
|
4.1 |
Impurity Removal Upstream of the LPMEOHTM
Demonstration Unit |
55 |
4.2 |
LPMEOH~ Demonstration Unit Catalyst Guard Bed
(29C-40) Configuration |
56 |
4.3 |
Catalyst Guard Bed Adsorbent Trial |
59 |
4.4 |
Catalyst Guard Bed Analysis |
59 |
5 |
Effect of Trace Contaminants on Catalyst Life in the
LPMEOH~ Demonstration Unit |
65 |
|
5.1 |
Overview of Trace Contaminant Issues at the LPMEOH~
Demonstration Unit |
65 |
5.2 |
Catalyst Performance: Catalyst Campaign 1 |
66 |
5.3 |
Catalyst Performance: Catalyst Campaign 2 |
67 |
5.4 |
Catalyst Performance: Catalyst Campaign 3 |
70 |
5.5 |
Catalyst Performance: Catalyst Campaign 4 |
71 |
C |
Conclusions |
72 |
D |
References |
76 |
|
APPENDICES |
APPENDIX A |
Experimental Techniques |
77 |