ABSTRACT |
|
|
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY |
|
|
1 |
INTRODUCTION |
1 |
2 |
POROUS CERAMIC FILTER MATRICES |
4 |
|
2.1 |
Monolithic Oxide-Based Ceramic Matrices |
4 |
2.2 |
Monolithic Nonoxide-Based Ceramic Matrices |
15 |
2.3 |
Second-Generation Oxide-Based Ceramic Matrices |
26 |
2.4 |
Second-Generation Nonoxide-Based Ceramic Matrices |
31 |
3 |
FIELD TESTING |
38 |
|
3.1 |
Overview |
38 |
3.2 |
Foster Wheeler PCFBC Test Campaigns |
39 |
4 |
FILTER FAILURE MECHANISMS |
44 |
5 |
ACCELERATED LIFE TESTING PROGRAMS |
54 |
|
5.1 |
Assessment of Advanced Second Generation Candle
Filters - Phase I |
54 |
5.2 |
Extended Accelerated Life Testing - Phase II |
58 |
|
5.2.1 |
Accelerated Pulse Cycle Exposure |
59 |
5.2.2 |
Thermal Transient Testing |
60 |
5.2.3 |
Material Characterization |
61 |
5.3 |
Accelerated Life Testing and High Temperature
Corrosion Studies - Phase III |
67 |
6 |
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
78 |
7 |
REFERENCES |
86 |
8 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
88 |
|
APPENDIX A - FILTER MATERIAL STRENGTH |
|
TABLES |
1 |
Hot Gas Filter Materials |
2 |
2 |
Porous Filter Technology Development |
3 |
3 |
Field and Extended Life Testing |
39 |
4 |
Summary of PCFBC Testing in 1995-1996 |
40 |
5 |
Summary of PCFBC Testing in 1997 |
42 |
6 |
Advanced Second Generation Candle Filter Material
Stability and Performance Evaluation |
54 |
7 |
Summary of the Extended Filter Life Test Program -
Phase I |
56 |
8 |
Extended Filter Life Testing - Phase II |
60 |
9 |
Residual Filter Element Room and High Temperature
Strength |
62 |
10 |
Residual Filter Element Room and High Temperature
Load Bearing Capabilities |
63 |
11 |
Residual Filter Element Room and High Temperature
Material Diametral Strength and Load Bearing Capabilities |
64 |
12 |
Candle Filter Array - Steady State, Accelerated
Pulse Cycling and Thermal Transient Testing - Phase III |
68 |
13 |
Candle Filter Array - High Temperature Corrosion
Testing - Phase III |
71 |
14 |
Porous Ceramic Filter Failure Mechanisms |
81 |
A-1 |
Residual Room and High Temperature Strength after
PFBC/PCFBC and Accelerated Life Testing |
|
|
FIGURES |
1 |
Porous candle and cross flow filter elements |
1 |
2 |
Variation in the candle filter flange geometry |
5 |
3 |
Variations in the candle filter flange and filter
wall thickness |
6 |
4 |
Variation in the candle filter closed end geometry |
7 |
5 |
Hot gas filter development - Geometric design
concepts |
8 |
6 |
High temperature particulate filtration |
8 |
7 |
As-manufactured Coors P-100A-1 alumina/mullite
filter matrix |
9 |
8 |
Extensive mullitization within the Coors P-100A-1
filter matrix with extended operation in PFBC/PCFBC applications |
9 |
9 |
Crystallization of the Coors P-100A-1 alumina/mullite
filter matrix resulted during PFBC/PCFBC operation leading to
extensive mullite formation along the surface of pore cavities
within the filter element |
10 |
10 |
Anorthite formation along the surface of the pore
cavities, and mullitization within the ligaments of the PFBC/PCFBC-exposed
Coors P-100A-1 alumina/mullite filter matrix |
11 |
11 |
Silica phase enrichment at the tips of the blunted
mullite rods along the pulse cycled surface of the PFBC/PCFBC-exposed
Coors P-100A-1 alumina/mullite filter matrix |
11 |
12 |
As-manufactured Blasch mullite bonded alumina filter
matrix |
12 |
13 |
Mullitization resulting within the Blasch filter
media with extended PFBC/PCBFC operation |
13 |
14 |
As-manufactured Ensto mullite bonded alumina filter
matrix |
13 |
15 |
Mullite formation along the outer surface of the
alumina grains contained within the as-manufactured Ensto filter
matrix |
14 |
16 |
Mullite ligament formation bonding adjacent alumina
grains together within the as-manufactured Ensto filter matrix |
14 |
17 |
Vacuum infiltrated chopped fibers contained within
the IF&P Fibrosic™
filter matrix |
15 |
18 |
Morphology of the as-manufactured Schumacher Dia
Schumalith clay bonded silicon carbide filter matrix |
16 |
19 |
Residual strength of the PFBC/PCFBC-aged and
extended life-tested porous ceramic filter elements |
17 |
20 |
Coalescence and crystallization of the binder
coating that encapsulated the silicon carbide grains within the
Schumacher filter matrix after 3038 hours of PFBC operation |
18 |
21 |
Micrograph montage illustrating coalescence and
crystallization of the binder coating along the surface of the
silicon carbide grains, as well as within the ligament bond posts of
the PFBC- exposed Pall clay bonded silicon carbide filter matrix |
18 |
22 |
Micrograph montage illustrating the thickness of the
silica-enriched layer that formed along the outer surface of the
silicon carbide grains within the Pall filter matrix after PFBC
operation |
19 |
23 |
Formation of mullite and silica within the
aluminosilicate binder phase that encapsulated the silicon carbide
grains within the PFBC/PCFBC-exposed Schumacher filter matrix |
19 |
24 |
Morphology of the fresh fractured Pall filter matrix
after PFBC/PCFBC operation |
20 |
25 |
Formation of a silica-enriched phase along the
surface of the silicon carbide grains, as well as at the base of the
filter ligaments within the PFBC/PCFBC - exposed Pall and Schumacher
filter matrices |
21 |
26 |
Crystallization resulting at the base of the fresh
fractured ligament in the PFBC-exposed Schumacher filter matrix |
22 |
27 |
Outgassing of species along the surface of the PFBC/PCFBC
- exposed Pall filter matrix leading to the formation of voids along
the silica-enriched crystallized surface |
22 |
28 |
As-manufactured IF&P recrystallized silicon carbide
filter matrix |
23 |
29 |
Formation of silica along the outer surface of the
IF&P recrystallized silicon carbide filter matrix |
23 |
30 |
Dendritic mullite formation along the surface of the
simulated PFBC- exposed IF&P recrystallized silicon carbide grains |
24 |
31 |
As-manufactured Ultramet CVI-SiC reticulated foam |
25 |
32 |
DuPont PRD-66 filament would filter matrix |
26 |
33 |
Filaments contained with the as-manufactured DuPont
PRD-66 filter matrix |
26 |
34 |
Cross-sectioned filament within the DuPont PRD-66
filter matrix |
27 |
35 |
Crystalline features along the outer surface of the
fiber replicas of the DuPont filter matrix |
28 |
36 |
Nextel™
filament bundles contained within the McDermott CFCC candle filter |
29 |
37 |
Filament fiber bundles embedded within the chopped
fiber matrix along the o.d. surface of the as-manufactured McDermott
CFCC filter element |
29 |
38 |
As-manufactured Techniweave CFCC filter element |
30 |
39 |
3M CVI-SiC filter matrix |
31 |
40 |
CVI-SiC layer deposited along the outer surface of
the 3M Nextel™
312 structural
support triaxial braid |
32 |
41 |
Sections of the 3M CVI-SiC composite candle filter
after PFBC or PCFBC operation |
32 |
42 |
Crack formation along the silica-enriched
infiltrated layers that surrounded the Nextel™
312 fibers in the triaxial support braid of the 3M composite filter
matrix after 2815 hours of exposure above the Siemens Westinghouse
APF system tubesheet at AEP |
33 |
43 |
Morphology of the cross-sectioned 3M CVI-SiC
composite filter material after 400 hours of exposure at 870°C
(1600°F) to 20 ppm NaCl/5-7% steam/air |
34 |
44 |
DuPont SiC-SiC CFCC filter architecture |
35 |
45 |
Morphology of the DuPont SiC-SiC CFCC hybrid filter
matrix after accelerated pulse cycle testing in SWPC's PFBC
simulator test facility |
36 |
46 |
SWPC APF system at the AEP PFBC Tidd demonstration
plant in Brialliant, OH |
38 |
47 |
Thermal fatigue of the Coors P-100A-1 alumina/mullite
filter matrix |
44 |
48 |
Coors p-100A-1 alumina/mullite closed end cap |
44 |
49 |
Crack formations at the base of the Pall Vitropore
filter flange as a result of high temperature creep during operation
at AEP |
45 |
50 |
Failure of the porous ceramic filter elements as the
result of ash bridging within the filter array |
46 |
51 |
Failure of the vacuum infiltrated chopped fibrous
candle filters |
46 |
52 |
Failure of the thinner walled 3M CFCC filter element
flange |
47 |
53 |
Failure of the DuPont PRD-66 filter element |
48 |
54 |
Failure of the Techniweave CFCC filter element after
operation in the PCFBC test facility in Karhula, Finland |
48 |
55 |
Failure of the 3M oxide-based CFCC filter elements |
49 |
56 |
Removal of fibers along the outer surface of the
McFermott CFCC filter element |
49 |
57 |
Critical inserts within the McDermott CFCC filter
element |
50 |
58 |
Crystallization of the Nextel™
fibers within the oxide-base CFCC filter matrices |
51 |
59 |
Failure of the 3M nonoxide-based CFCC filter element |
52 |
60 |
Failure of the DuPont SiC-SiC CFCC filter matrix |
53 |
61 |
Residual room and process temperature compressive
strength of the various ceramic candle filter materials as a
function of field and extended simulated PFBC accelerated life
testing |
65 |
62 |
Residual room and process temperature tensile
strength of the various ceramic candle filter materials as a
function of field and extended simulated PFBC accelerated life
testing |
66 |
63 |
Ceramic and metal candle filter array |
67 |
64 |
Temperature profile during thermal transient testing |
69 |
65 |
Filter elements at the conclusion of steady state,
accelerated pulse cycling and thermal transient testing |
70 |
66 |
Failure of the Blasch mullite bonded alumina candle
filter after 282 hours of operation in the 840°C
(1550°F), simulated PFBC process gas environment containing gas
phase sulfure and alkali (Test Segment No. 1) |
71 |
67 |
Candle filters at the conclusion of Test Segment No.
2 - 486 hours of exposure at 840°C
(1550°F) in the simulated PFBC process gas environment containing
gas phase sulfure and alkali |
72 |
68 |
Room temperature gas flow resistance through the
porous filter elements |
73 |
69 |
Schumacher clay bonded silicon carbide FT20 filter
matrix after 204 hours of operation in the gas phase alkali and
sulfur-laden, 840°C
(1550°F), simulated PFBC process gas environment |
74 |
70 |
Morphology of the Filtros recrystallized silicon
carbide filter matrix after 486 hours of operation in the gas phase
alkali and sulfur-laden, 840°C
(1550°F), simulated PFBC process gas environment |
74 |
71 |
Morphology of the Blasch filter matrix after 282
hours of exposure to the 840°C
(1550°F), gas phase alkali and sulfur-laden, simulated PFBC process
gas environment |
75 |
72 |
Microstructure of the DuPont PRD-66 filter matrix
after 486 hours of exposure to the gas phase alkali and
sulfur-laden, 840°C
(1550°F), simulated PFBC process gas environment |
76 |
73 |
Microstructure of the McDermott CFCC filter matrix
after 486 hours of exposure to the gas phase alkali and
sulfur-laden, 840°C
(1550°F), simulated PFBC process gas environment |
76 |
74 |
Microstructure of the Techniweave CFCC filter matrix
after 486 hours of exposure to the gas phase alkali and
sulfur-laden, 840°C
(1550°F), simulated PFBC process gas environment |
77 |
75 |
Microstructure of the Pall FeAl filter matrix after
204 hours of operation in the gas phase alkali and sulfur-laden PFBC
process gas environment |
77 |
76 |
Porous hot gas filter material technology
development |
78 |
77 |
Porous monolithic nonoxide-based ceramics used for
hot gas filter technology development |
79 |
78 |
Porous monolithic oxide-based ceramics used for hot
gas filter technology development |
80 |
79 |
Porous second-generation oxide-based ceramics used
for hot gas filter technology development |
82 |
80 |
Porous second generation nonoxide-based ceramics
used for hot gas filter techonology development |
83 |
81 |
Recommended maximum operating temperatures for hot
gas filter material stability |
84 |